Discipling households vs individuals
Feb 23, 2016
You’ve no doubt heard a proposition like one of the following:
Of course, this rarely happens.
We can blame it on apathy; or, as Zwemer did, on the ‘wicked selfishness of Christians.’ I theorize the real reason is a little more dull, and has to do with “Dunbar’s Number,” uncovered by the psychologist Robin Dunbar.
This is a theoretical mental limit on the number of people—about 150— with whom you can have a ‘stable’ social relationship.
There have been a variety of reasons suggested for why this is the case: Dunbar extrapolated it from studies of primates and correlations in brain sizes.
Whether you blame it on the size of your head or the amount of time you have to spend with people (vs. work, sleep, family relationships, etc), the obvious reality is: you can only be “besties” with so many people.
Further: ‘Dunbar’s number’ is actually a series of numbers.
‘150’ are ‘casual friends’ who you might invite to a large group event.
Closer to you are the ‘50’: you see them often, might have some of them over for dinner,but are not ‘best friends.’ The ‘15’: who you turn to for sympathy, confide in, seek help from.
Finally, the ‘5’: close supporters, intimates, often family members.
(And, more broadly: ‘500’ acquaintances, and the ‘1,500’ is your wider ‘tribe,’ for whom you can probably put a name to a face.)
If you’re going to evangelize someone (‘go over and share the Gospel with them’), they are probably somewhere between your ‘500’ and your ‘50’.
But if you’re going to disciple someone—spend time with them on a semi-weekly basis, probably—they will rapidly become at least one of your ‘50’ if not one of your ‘15’.
And there is one of the costs.
Ask yourself: how many people do I have regular, close, weekly, semi-daily or daily contact with? Make a list.
Several names are probably family (I have a wife and four children on my daily list).
There are people we work with, people we go to church with, who we hang out with, and so on.
What you will probably see: of the 5, 15, and 50 slots you have, most are already taken up by believers.
One reason: most Christians live in places where Christians are the vast majority (so most of the people you naturally know are believers).
Second: most Christians were born into Christian households and grew up as Christians, so most of your ‘5’ and ‘15’ were Christians before you arrived.
Third: in our regular social contacts, we prefer people like us (‘don’t smoke, chew, or run with those who do.’) Discipling someone requires spending time with them.
But if it means one of our ‘150’ becomes one of our ‘50,’ it also means we will (probably) spend less time with someone else—one of our ‘50’ will become one of our ‘150.’ We only have so much time.
Maybe you already have a non-believer in your ‘50’ or ‘15’.
Why not disciple them? Here’s the second issue of Dunbar’s Number for us: we can offer them the Gospel, but the challenge is their ’5’, ‘15’ and ‘50’.
In The rise of Christianity, Rodney Stark details how the sociological process of conversion makes it more likely when “people have or develop stronger attachments to members of the [Christian] group than they have to nonmembers” (p. 18).
The nonbelievers we meet will likely fall into one of three categories:
An example might be the errant child, uncle, backslidden parent, etc.
In such a case, they already made a choice against the Gospel.
Getting them to reverse it will be a challenge.
If they refuse, you may have to spend less time with them in order to spend more time with another non-Christian who is hungry.
We often don’t want to do this, but it is Biblical (Matthew 10:14, Acts 13:51).
(And I’m not suggesting cutting off contact entirely—we’re talking about reducing total time allocation, only.)
An example is the believer who lives in the same neighborhood as a non-believer.
He may see you in the morning when you head out to work, but has ‘stronger attachments to members of the non-Christian group,’ and often more material/security reasons to remain non-Christian.
An example is a believer who works in a secular company, and whose close work colleague is a non-Christian.
The two meet daily at work, but the non-believer’s closest family and friends are largely non-Christian, and it is to them he or she is tied.
The most intimate connections can help determine response.
Except for three (Paul himself, the Ethiopian Eunuch, and proconsul Sergius Paulus), those who came to faith in Acts did so in groups and households.
(The three came to faith in the context of a miracle.) The Bible tells us frequently: ‘you will be saved, you and your household’ (Acts 11:14, 16:15, 16:31, 16:34, 18:8). If one individual converts to Christianity when his ‘5’ and ‘15’ are not, he may be seen to have taken a stance against them.
He is won, but at the cost of the ‘5’ and ‘15’? Is it possible by reaching out to the whole group you can avoid that choice altogether?
Disciple-making movement thinking takes the extraordinary step of saying: As far as possible, don’t disciple the ‘1’—disciple the ‘5’ or ‘15’.
Try to get the ‘Person of Peace’ (the non-Christian who is a seeker, or who is at least interested) to open their network, so the whole group hears and decides at roughly the same time.
We ask: “Why don’t you bring your family over, and we’ll read some stories from the Bible together?” This shift in thinking is one of the keys to rapid expansion in movements.